Role of telemedicine in anesthesia: Are we ready yet?

Telemedicine is a modality which utilizes technology to provide and support health care across large distances. It has redefined the practices of medicine in many specialties and continues to be a boon for clinicians on many frontiers. Its role in the branch of anesthesia remains largely unexplored but has shown to be beneficial in all the three phases: pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative. Now time has come that anesthesiologists across the globe reassess their strategies and utilize the telemedicine facilities in the field of anesthesia.Copyright © 2021 EDP Sciences. All rights reserved.

Awake Intubation Techniques, and Why It Is Still an Important Skill to Master

Purpose of Review: Awake intubation has been a staple of difficult airway management since the first American Society of Anesthesiologists difficult airway guidelines were developed in the 1980s. In current anesthetic practice, use of second generation supraglottic airways and video laryngoscopy are ubiquitous. The goal of this review is to examine the impact that these airway advances have had on the use of awake intubation and the need to maintain this skill. Recent Findings: Despite advancements, evidence suggests that the rate of awake intubation has changed little over the last two decades. Recent literature has focused on the use of alternatives to the flexible intubation scope, including awake intubation with video laryngoscopy, combined video laryngoscopy-flexible intubation, and combined supraglottic airway-flexible intubation. Summary: Awake intubation remains an essential technique in airway management. Future research should focus on determining the specific patient populations that would benefit from the variety of awake intubation techniques now described.Copyright © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

A prospective cohort evaluation of the McGrathTM MAC videolaryngoscope in a series of 979 cases

Background: Evidence favouring the effectiveness of videolaryngoscopes over conventional direct laryngoscopy for facilitating successful tracheal intubation has been growing. However, to choose be-tween different devices, clinicians need to know how individual devices perform outside of carefully controlled clinical trials.Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of the McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope as it was introduced into clinical practice. Methods: Cohort evaluation of McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope use in clinical practice by voluntary completion of an evaluation form over a two-year period.Results: In a total of 979 cases, tracheal intubation was successful in 955/979 (97.5%), with first pass success achieved in 785/955 (82.2%). Most tracheal intubations (964/979, 80.1%) were performed during 'office hours' (Monday to Friday 0800-1800). Senior anaesthetists conducted 423/970 (43.6%) of in-tubations. There were 24/979 (2.5%) failed intubations, with consultants or senior anaesthetists con-ducting laryngoscopy in the majority of these;in 16/22 failed intubations, a grade I or II glottic view was obtained on the videolaryngoscope screen. Of the 20 anaesthetists involved as intubators, 14 had used the device fewer than 50 times.Conclusion: Our historical results demonstrate the effectiveness and feasibility of using the McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope to facilitate tracheal intubation in clinical practice. However, we believe the most important finding was the number of "easy" grade I and II glottic views on videolaryngoscopy where tracheal intubation was not achieved. Our experience and the evidence suggest that in order to fully realise the numerous benefits of videolaryngoscopy, the introduction of formal teaching and in-struction by trained trainers is essential. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Videolaryngoscopy: a seismic shift in culture

Evidence shows videolaryngoscopy (VL) creates a safe atmosphere for tracheal intubations by reducing failed intubations and increasing first-pass success [1]. In 2017, University College London Hospital was one of the first hospitals in the UK to roll out VL to all anaesthetic areas to promote patient safety at a time of increased airway complexity cases. We aim to compare staff attitudes about VL at the time of introduction and 3-years later. Methods We sent online surveys to anaesthetists of all grades before and after the introduction of VL. We had over 90 responses to both surveys. Results Our survey results show that anaesthetists are becoming more in favour of VL with > 93% supporting their use. They show 78% gave VL a maximum +5 on the Likert scale;this is an increase from 59% in the initial survey. It indicates that > 88% perceive VL to promote patient safety, improve quality of care, help in training and improve team dynamics of the intubation process. We see overwhelming support for their use in COVID-19 patients with only 1% of survey respondents having negative views. Subjective responses show that clinicians perceived VL to add 'patient and operator safety'. This is due to 'increased distance of operator from the airway';'reducing anticipated infection risk' and 'improving ease of intubation in the hypoxic patient'. They also feel that VL helps 'share a mental model with the team when other aspects of communication are impaired by PPE'. Our surveys demonstrate fewer concerns with VL over the 3-year period. The results show that concerns amongst anaesthetists with regard to training and familiarity had dropped from 33% to 25%. Concerns over the use of single-use equipment had decreased from 81% to 66%, and concerns regarding documentation of VL intubation grades dropped from 59% to 38%;however, there remains a small but noticeable increase in concern over the loss of direct laryngoscopy skills amongst junior anaesthetists from 55% to 64%. Discussion Our surveys demonstrate a department-wide change in attitude that favours the use of VL. Crucially, clinicians feel that VL provides a strong positive patient safety effect and promotes shared decision-making at a time when rare catastrophic events such as unrecognised oesophageal intubation still occur. The pandemic has proven to be a major catalyst for their increased use and familiarity, which is likely to propel the widespread use of VL in the future.

DON'T CUT THE NECK: A NOVEL OPTION FOR DEFINITIVE RESCUE AIRWAY

SESSION TITLE: Close Critical Care Calls SESSION TYPE: Case Reports PRESENTED ON: 10/18/2022 11:15 am - 12:15 pm INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 has resulted in many patients presenting in severe hypoxemic respiratory failure without the ability to achieve adequate oxygenation despite non-invasive positive pressure ventilation prior to attempting endotracheal intubation. Recently, the American Academy of Anesthesiology (AAOA) released an updated 2022 guideline addressing difficult airway management. Though evidence is limited, the use of a combination maneuvers with a supraglottic airway and lighted stylet yielded a greater than 75% intubation success rate after failed direct laryngoscopy [1]. The following case emphasizes a novel definitive airway rescue option for an anatomically and physiologically difficult airway, complicated by an inability to ventilate and oxygenate in the setting of severe hypoxemic respiratory failure. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient is a 58 year old, morbidly obese (BMI-58) female with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and severe refractory hypoxemia on Bi-Level non-invasive ventilation (inspiratory pressure 20, expiratory pressure 15, 100% fraction inspired oxygen) complicated by an acute complete opacification of the left hemi-thorax and right pneumothorax with oxygen saturation (SpO2) of 80%. Rapid sequence induction was attempted, however failed despite multiple maneuvers. Due to continued deterioration of the patient's oxygenation, a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) was placed with improvement of the patient's oxygen saturation. A single-use disposable bronchoscope was then placed through the LMA with successful navigation through the vocal cords and direct visualization of the tip within the right main-stem bronchus. Using trauma shears, the handle of the bronchoscope was cut away from the insertion tube. The LMA was then retracted (Fig. 1) and forceps were utilized to maintain position of the insertion tube (Fig. 2) during this maneuver. The video laryngoscope blade was then reinserted into the oropharynx for visualization of the insertion tube coursing through the vocal cords. Using the insertion tube from the single-use bronchoscope as a stylet, intubation was successfully accomplished by inserting a 7.5mm ETT over the insertion tube under direct visualization with the video laryngoscope (Fig. 3). DISCUSSION: Single use bronchoscope devices have been successfully used for planned awake intubations [2] as well as confirmation of endotracheal tube placement [3] after emergent intubation. The novel technique described above can be a useful measure to facilitate intubation under direct visualization in complicated airway scenarios without the need for a surgical airway. CONCLUSIONS: This technique offers a number of advantages to include direct visualization of the airway, navigational capability of bronchoscopy and confirmation of placement with video laryngoscopy. The combination of these techniques can be considered as an alternative prior to pursuing an invasive surgical option. Reference #1: Jeffrey L. Apfelbaum, Carin A. Hagberg, Richard T. Connis, Basem B. Abdelmalak, Madhulika Agarkar, Richard P. Dutton, John E. Fiadjoe, Robert Greif, P. Allan Klock, David Mercier, Sheila N. Myatra, Ellen P. O'Sullivan, William H. Rosenblatt, Massimiliano Sorbello, Avery Tung;2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2022;136:31–81 doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000004002 Reference #2: Kristensen MS, Fredensborg BB. The disposable Ambu aScope vs. a conventional flexible videoscope for awake intubation – a randomised study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 Aug;57(7):888-95. doi: 10.1111/aas.12094. Epub 2013 Mar 15. PMID: 23495767 Reference #3: Mitra A, Gave A, Coolahan K, Nguyen T. Confirmation of endotracheal tube placement using disposable fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the emergent setting. World J Emerg Med. 2019;10(4):210-214. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2019.04.003. PMID: 31534594;PMCID: PMC6732169 DISCLOSURES: No relevant r lationships by John Levasseur No relevant relationships by Lauren Sattler No relevant relationships by Tyson Sjulin

Role of High Flow Nasal Oxygenation During Video Laryngoscopy Assisted Intubation in COVID-positive Patients: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial

Aim and background: In adult COVID-19 patients presenting with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, conventional oxygen therapy may be insufficient to meet the oxygen needs. Other considerable options are high flow nasal oxygen cannula (HFNC), non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) preoxygenation is required before endotracheal intubation. The aim of this study is to compare preoxygenation by HFNC and its comparison with conventional mask ventilation in patient requiring intubation in an intensive care unit (ICU). Materials and methods: After obtaining ethical committee clearance, 60 patients requiring intubation in ICU were included in the study. All the patients who were admitted in the COVID ICU, and were not maintaining saturation on a facemask, NIV, or HFNC for these patient decisions of intubation were made. Patients were randomized into two groups. In group M, conventional mask ventilation was done and in group H HFNC was used for preoxygenation. The primary endpoint of the study was the lowest SPO2 during video laryngoscopic intubation. Secondary objectives were time taken for intubation and aerosol generation. Results: Lowest SPO2 was more in the case of group M compared to group H and this difference was significant with p value of 0.00139. Aerosol generation was more in the case of group M compared to group H with p value of 0.009. Time taken for intubation was comparable in both groups. Conclusion: HFNC is a better alternative compared to mask ventilation in COVID-positive patients as better safer apnea time in patient of COVID presenting with acute respiratory failure.

Anesthetic Approach and Perioperative Complications in Cleft Lip/Palate Surgery: A Single Center Retrospective Study

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine factors that may affect anesthesia and surgical complications, difficult airway, and the need for intensive care unit (ICU) care in cleft lip and cleft palate (CLCP) surgeries. Materials and Methods: The study was a retrospective review of the records of 617 patients who underwent CLCP surgery between 2015–2019. Results: The number of anesthesia complications was higher in patients with difficult mask ventilation. Surgical complications were more common in patients >1 year of age. Isolated cleft palate (CP) surgery;presence of a concomitant disease, syndrome, or micrognathia;age >1 year;and the CP subtype were associated with a higher rate of difficult intubation. Isolated cleft palate, concomitant disease, syndrome, micrognathia, difficult intubation, difficult mask ventilation, and anesthesia complications were associated with ICU admission. Conclusion: The CP subtype was associated with a higher rate of difficult intubation and ICU hospitalization even in patients who were nonsyndromic and/or >1 year of age. Therefore, special attention should be paid to the anesthesia and surgical management of these patients.

Isolated Severe Dysphonia as a Presentation of Post-COVID-19 Syndrome.

This is the first study assessing the clinical management of severe, isolated dysphonia during post-COVID-19 syndrome. One hundred and fifty-eight subjects met the inclusion criteria for the post-COVID-19 condition as specified by the WHO. Six patients were diagnosed with isolated severe dysphonia, constituting 3.8% of the initial group. The pre- and post-examination protocol consisted of subjective voice self-assessment and routine laryngological examination, followed by an instrumental examination by means of Laryngovideostroboscopy (LVS) and High-Speed Videolaryngoscopy (HSV). The treatment included short-term systemic steroids in decreasing doses, moisturizing inhalations with hyaluronic acid, and protective agents against Laryngopharyngeal Reflux. The kinematic imaging of the glottis performed by means of HSV before treatment showed deviations in the regularity and symmetry of vocal fold vibrations, absence of mucosal wave, and incomplete glottal closure. Improvement of the structural and functional state of the larynx was observed post-treatment. Kymographic sections and Glottal Width Waveform (GWW) graphs obtained from post-treatment HSV recordings showed improvement in vocal fold vibrations. The decrease in mean Jitter and Shimmer was observed, with the following mean values of 3.16 pre-treatment and 2.97 post-treatment for Jitter and 7.16 pre-treatment and 2.77 post-treatment for Shimmer. The post-treatment self-evaluation of voice showed considerable improvement in vocal function and voice quality in all the examined patients. Severe dysphonia in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome requires urgent ENT diagnosis using instrumental assessment with the evaluation of laryngeal phonatory function and intensive comprehensive treatment.

Primary Vocal Cord Aspergillosis

Fungal infection of vocal cord in immunocompetent host is rare and may be missed as the lesion may mimic granulomatous disease, carcinoma, leukoplakia etc. Here we present a case of a healthy male patient. A 77 years old male patient presented to ENT specialist with complaints of hoarseness of voice for last 3 months. The patient was a non-smoker, not immunocompromised or taking immunosuppressive drugs. He was prone to seasonal bouts of cough & cold with sneezing. Video laryngoscopy showed inflamed tonsils and congested vallecula & epiglottis. Both vocal cords showed proliferative mass, white keratotic patch in anterior & middle third portion with restricted movement. Tissue samples from both vocal cords was sent for histopathology (HP). Slide examination revealed necrotic exudate containing broad based aseptate fungal hyphae and a provisional diagnosis of vocal cord fungal infection favoring Mucor mycosis was made. Patient was started on Itraconazole 100 mg twice daily along with treatment for patient's allergic condition. The slides and tissue sample obtained by direct laryngoscopy were sent to a different lab for reconfirmation. Further HP examination showed necrotic exudate and fibrin deposits with abundant fungal spores & hyphae. Grocott methenamine silver (GMS) stain & Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining showed fungal spores and branching septate fungal hyphae confirming a diagnosis of vocal cord aspergillosis. His routine blood tests, serology, ECG reports were normal. RTPCR (Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction) for SARS-CoV-2 was negative. After final diagnosis, patient was referred to pulmonologist to exclude pulmonary aspergillosis. Medication was changed to Voriconazole 200 mg twice daily along with antileukotrienes & antihistamines for his seasonal allergies. Patient was asked to follow up with CT chest to exclude pulmonary aspergillosis. The CT chest did not show any chest pathology. His voice was normal and other physical examinations were within normal limit. He was prescribed Voriconazole 200 mg twice daily for 3 months along with antihistamines, antileukotrienes, proton pump inhibitors & cough syrup. He was advised to come for follow up with liver function test after 4 weeks. Primary fungal infection of vocal cords is rare. Fungal infection is common in immunocompromised host but to detect such cases in healthy immunocompetent patient requires high level of suspicion and usually oral antifungal therapy for 3-4 weeks results in complete resolution of symptoms & lesion as per the current literature. (Figure Presented).

Videolaryngoscopy as a first-intention technique for tracheal intubation in unselected surgical patients: a before and after observational study.

BACKGROUND: Using a Macintosh-style videolaryngoscope as a first-intention device for tracheal intubation of unselected patients in the operating room has not often been studied. We hypothesised that using a Macintosh-style videolaryngoscope as a first-intention device is associated with an increased proportion of easy tracheal intubation. METHODS: In a quality improvement project for airway management aimed at implementing a Macintosh-style videolaryngoscope as a first-intention device, we included all consecutive tracheal intubations in adults from March, 2017 to September, 2020 in two French teaching hospitals. We divided the cohort into three temporal cohorts: the pre-intervention, implementation, and post-intervention periods. The primary outcome was the proportion of easy airway management. The secondary outcomes were the rescue technique, Cormack-Lehane III or IV view, and operator-reported difficulty of intubation. Data from one hospital compliant with the quality improvement project were compared with data from a non-compliant hospital. RESULTS: A total of 26 692 tracheal intubations were performed. Among 11 938 intubations included in the compliant hospital, 5487 were included in the pre-intervention, 1845 in the implementation, and 4606 in the post-intervention periods. In comparison to the pre-intervention period, the proportions of easy tracheal intubation increased from 94.3% (5177 of 5487) to 98.7% (4547 of 4606)) in the post-intervention period (+4.4% [95% confidence interval 3.7-5.1%], P<0.001). In comparison to the pre-intervention period, all secondary outcome proportions were significantly lower in the post-intervention period. No significant changes were noted in the non-compliant hospital between the pre- and post-intervention periods. CONCLUSIONS: Using a Macintosh-style videolaryngoscope as a first-intention device for tracheal intubation in the operating room was associated with a significant increase in the proportion of easy tracheal intubation, compared with use of the standard Macintosh laryngoscope.

Video-Assisted Stylet Intubation with a Plastic Sheet Barrier, a Safe and Simple Technique for Tracheal Intubation of COVID-19 Patients.

As the COVID-19 pandemic evolves, infection with the Omicron variants has become a serious risk to global public health. Anesthesia providers are often called upon for endotracheal intubations for COVID patients. Expedite and safe intubation can save patient's life, while minimizing the virus exposure to the anesthesia provider and personnel involved during airway intervention is very important to protect healthcare workers and conserve the medical work force. In this paper, we share clinical experience of using a video-assisted intubating stylet technique combined with a simple plastic sheet barrier placed over the patients' mouth for tracheal intubation during the Omicron crisis in Taiwan. We demonstrated that the use of an intubating stylet combined with plastic sheet barrier is swift, safe, and accurate in securing the airway in patients with COVID-19.

Comparison of intubation barrier devices in a simulated airway task trainer

Learning Objectives: We aim to demonstrate a preferred device to be used for physician protection during the intubation of Covid-19 patients using a simulated model. In addition, we wish to demonstrate which device causes the least interference with the intubation process. Background: With the advent of the SARS-CoV2 (Covid-19) pandemic, there have been significant concerns regarding transmission of the disease to Healthcare Professionals, particularly during intubation procedures. Several forms of barrier protection aimed at decreasing the spread of aerosolized droplets were developed during the early onset of the pandemic. Objectives: Using a simulated airway task trainer, we examined the impact that 3 separate barrier devices had on intubation time and success using both direct and video laryngoscopy. We hypothesized that lighter and more simplistic devices would be preferred and would provide faster intubations. Methods: The subjects of this study comprise of attending level emergency physicians and anesthesiologists employed at a community hospital who were asked to fill out surveys regarding their experience with the barrier devices from previous simulated intubations. In addition, 10 attending level emergency physicians participated in a Just in Time training session in which they performed both direct and video laryngoscopies on an airway task trainer using each of the devices. An independent observer recorded the time it took for each physician to set up the device and to successfully intubate the task trainer. Results: The main results of the survey are depicted in Figure 1a-d. 97 percent of respondents indicated a preference for video laryngoscopy for Covid-19 positive patients. In general, this cohort preferred a plain clear plastic drape or clear plastic drape with PVC cube for direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy set ups (Figure 2a-d). Use of these two devices resulted in significantly faster times to intubation when compared with the fiberglass box. Conclusion: In general, a simple, plastic sheet was the preferred barrier device using video laryngoscopy. Although set up times were faster using the fiberglass box, intubation times were significantly faster using the plastic drape or PVC frame.

Emergency Pediatric Intubations in an Urban Children's Hospital Before and After Just-in-Time Training for Video Laryngoscopy.

OBJECTIVES: The use of video laryngoscopy (VL) may augment emergency pediatric intubations outside the operating room (OR). Our objective was to describe the proportion of use and complications with VL before and after implementation of a VL just-in-time training (JITT). STUDY DESIGN: This study was a retrospective chart review of pediatric intubations performed outside the OR at a single women and children's hospital from January 2015 to March 2020. Data were collected on patient age, intubation method, operator characteristics, adverse events, number of attempts, condition leading to intubation, and hospital location. Data were separated into pre-JITT (January 1, 2015 to April 31, 2018) and post-JITT (May 1, 2018 to March 1, 2020) periods. Descriptive statistics were used comparing pre- and post-JITT periods for VL use, and the complications of intubations with multiple attempts (IMAs) and intubations with one or more adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: A total of 231 pediatric patients were intubated during the study period; 154 intubations in the pre-JITT and 77 intubations in the post-JITT periods. Pre- and post-JITT VL use was 17 (11%) and 17 (22%), respectively. With pre-JITT VL, there were four (23%) IMAs and zero (0%) intubation with one or more AE. With post-JITT VL, there were eight (47%) IMAs and one (6%) intubation with one or more AE. CONCLUSION: The proportion of emergency pediatric intubations using VL increased after the institution of a JITT. There was no significant change in IMAs and AEs. The infrequency of pediatric intubations makes drawing conclusions regarding the impact on IMAs and AEs challenging. JITT may increase VL use for emergency pediatric intubations outside the OR and may be considered for refresher training, especially during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Intubation using VieScope vs. Video laryngoscopy in full personal protective equipment - a randomized, controlled simulation trial.

BACKGROUND: VieScope is a new type of laryngoscope, with a straight, transparent and illuminated blade, allowing for direct line of sight towards the larynx. In addition, VieScope is disposed of after single patient use, which can avoid cross-contaminations of contagious material. This has gained importance especially when treating patients with highly contagious infectious diseases, such as during the SARS-CoV2 pandemic. In this context, VieScope has not been evaluated yet in a clinical study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study compared intubation with VieScope to video-laryngoscopy (GlideScope) in normal and difficult airway in a standardized airway manikin in a randomized controlled simulation trial. Thirty-five medical specialists were asked to perform endotracheal intubation in full personal protective equipment (PPE). Primary endpoint was correct tube position. First-pass rate (i.e., success rate at the first attempt), time until intubation and time until first correct ventilation were registered as secondary endpoints. RESULTS: For correct tracheal tube placement, there was no significant difference between VieScope and GlideScope in normal and difficult airway conditions. VieScope had over 91% fist-pass success rate in normal airway setting. VieScope had a comparable success rate to GlideScope in difficult airway, but had a significantly longer time until intubation and time until ventilation. CONCLUSION: VieScope and GlideScope had high success rates in normal as well as in difficult airway. There was no unrecognized esophageal intubation in either group. Overall time for intubation was longer in the VieScope group, though in an acceptable range given in literature. Results from this simulation study suggest that VieScope may be an acceptable alternative for tracheal intubation in full PPE. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register www.drks.de (Registration date: 09/11/2020; TrialID: DRKS00023406 ).

Tracheal intubation while wearing personal protective equipment in simulation studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial-sequential analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tracheal intubation in patients with coronavirus disease-19 is a high-risk procedure that should be performed with personal protective equipment (PPE). The influence of PPE on operator's performance during tracheal intubation remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of simulation studies to evaluate the influence of wearing PPE as compared to standard uniform regarding time-to-intubation (TTI) and success rate. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to device used and operator's experience. RESULTS: The TTI was prolonged when wearing PPE (eight studies): Standard Mean Difference (SMD) -0.54, 95% Confidence Interval [-0.75, -0.34], p <  0.0001. Subgroup analyses according to device used showed similar findings (direct laryngoscopy, SMD -0.63 [-0.88, -0.38], p < 0.0001; videolaryngoscopy, SMD -0.39 [-0.75, -0.02], p =  0.04). Considering the operator's experience, non-anesthesiologists had prolonged TTI (SMD -0.75 [-0.98, -0.52], p < 0.0001) while the analysis on anesthesiologists did not show significant differences (SMD -0.25 [-0.51, 0.01], p = 0.06). The success rate of tracheal intubation was not influenced by PPE: Risk Ratio (RR) 1.02 [1.00, 1.04]; p = 0.12). Subgroup analyses according to device demonstrated similar results (direct laryngoscopy, RR 1.03 [0.99, 1.07], p = 0.15, videolaryngoscopy, RR 1.01 [0.98, 1.04], p =  0.52). Wearing PPE had a trend towards negative influence on success rate in non-anesthesiologists (RR 1.05 [1.00, 1.10], p = 0.05), but not in anesthesiologists (RR 1.00 [0.98, 1.03], p = 0.84). Trial-sequential analyses for TTI and success rate indicated robustness of both results. CONCLUSIONS: Under simulated conditions, wearing PPE delays the TTI as compared to dressing standard uniform, with no influence on the success rate. However, certainty of evidence is very low. Performing tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy seems influenced to a greater extent as compared to videolaryngoscopy. Similarly, wearing PPE affects more the non-anesthesiologists subgroup as compared to anesthesiologists.

Airway Management and Related Procedures in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: Position Statement of the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine.

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has affected nearly all nations globally. The highly contagious nature of the disease puts the healthcare workers at high risk of acquiring infection, especially while handling airway and performing aerosol-generating procedures. The Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, through this position paper, aims to provide guidance for safe airway management to all healthcare workers dealing with airway in COVID-19 patients. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Praveen Kumar G, Kulkarni AP, Govil D, Dixit SB, Chaudhry D, Samavedam S, et al. Airway Management and Related Procedures in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: Position Statement of the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(8):630-642.

Safety Protocols for Videolaryngoscopy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective Review of 196 Cases.

To prepare safety protocols for performing videolaryngoscopy (VLS) during COVID-19 pandemic, that would be feasible for patients, hospital and the health care providers. This was a prospective study performed from March 01, 2020 to June 30, 2020. It analyzed the precautions adapted for VLS initially and subsequently describes modifications with the time. The safety protocols are developed considering the safety aspect, the feasibility aspect (due to increase in number of the VLS), and the financial aspect. The VLS was performed with the personal protective equipment (PPE), including the face shield mask and head cover. The PPE was re-used after sterilization with ethylene oxide. For local anesthesia, the oropharynx was sprayed with 15% xylocaine and nose packed with 4% xylocaine soaked pledget. Following the VLS, the scope was wiped three times with 80% alcohol and then immersed in 5.25% sodium hypochlorite and 0.55% ortho-phthalaldehyde for 10 min each. Each VLS was spaced by at least 15 min gap. The endoscopy suite maintained with laminar air flow. It can be concluded that during the COVID-19 pandemic, the VLS must be performed using PPE with proper sterilization of the scope and the endoscopy suite after the procedure. The use of face shield mask and 15% xylocaine spray into the oropharynx were also highlighted. The financial burden should be minimized by reusing the materials whenever possible.